Nation's Toughest Fracking Bill To Be Signed By CA Gov. Jerry Brown

SB 4 passed the legislature over strong objections from the oil and business community. California will go from having no well stimulation (includes acidizing) regulation set in statute to the nation's toughest, so why are environmentalists unhappy?

3 minute read

September 13, 2013, 8:00 AM PDT

By Irvin Dawid


California's fracking debate, which we noted here in February, appears to be coming to an end. Marc Lifsher writes that state Senator Fran Pavley's bill, which "would give California the nation's toughest [fracking] regulation...had widespread support from most environmental groups, but some of them withdrew their endorsement just before the Assembly vote Wednesday (Sept. 11)."  

Lifsher's newspaper, the Los Angeles Times, explains why they withdrew their own support for the bill in their Sept. 12 editorial as a result of amendments made on Sept. 6. that are analyzed here.

In recent amendments, the key regulatory element of the bill was so weakened that it is no longer recognizable...[T]he bill now could exclude many fracking projects from meaningful environmental review.  The amendments have led various environmental organizations to withdraw their support. We previously endorsed the bill, and Pavley deserves praise for trying, but at this point SB 4 is so flawed that it would be better to kill it and press for more serious legislation next year.

Lifsher writes that's not likely to happen. "The bill now goes to Gov. Jerry Brown, who said Wednesday that he would sign it into law." 

While some environmentalists were upset with the recent changes, the oil industry has consistently "opposed the bill, arguing it would make it harder for them to exploit the estimated 15 billion barrels of oil in the Monterey Shale Formation in the southern San Joaquin Valley" [and the largest shale oil reserves in the nation], writes Lifsher. Their opposition contributed to the defeat of stronger bills that imposed moratoriums, explaining in part why "only Senate Bill 4 remains", writes Capitol Alert's Jeremy B. White.

I still believe that a moratorium is the best way to go with respect to fracking," said Assemblyman Richard Bloom, D-Santa Monica, "but this bill is the next best alternative."

Grist blogger, John Upton, writes, "Environmentalists who had cautiously supported the bill, which many described as flawed, have turned into vociferous opponents. The East Bay Express explains":

Last week, after intense backroom lobbying, the powerful oil and gas industry convinced state Senator Fran Pavley of Los Angeles... to further weaken her legislation and include poison-pill amendments. If enacted, it promises to do more harm than good.

The amendments included how the Calif. Environmental Quality Act is applied to well stimulation as interpreted by the Department of Conservation's Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources.

The Environmental Defense Center did not withdraw their support for the bill, according to the legislative analysis, acknowledging that California "lags far behind other major oil and gas producing states...SB 4 would remedy this unacceptable status quo."

White doesn't appear so certain that Jerry Brown will sign the bill.

The governor has a precarious relationship with environmentalists, some of whom accuse him of being overly lenient with the energy industry, so his decision will come under heavy scrutiny.

Thursday, September 12, 2013 in Los Angeles Times - Business

Portland Bus Lane

‘Forward Together’ Bus System Redesign Rolling Out in Portland

Portland is redesigning its bus system to respond to the changing patterns of the post-pandemic world—with twin goals of increasing ridership and improving equity.

August 30, 2023 - Mass Transit

An aerial view of Milwaukee’s Third Ward.

Plan to Potentially Remove Downtown Milwaukee’s Interstate Faces Public Scrutiny

The public is weighing in on a suite of options for repairing, replacing, or removing Interstate 794 in downtown Milwaukee.

August 27, 2023 - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Conceptual rendering of Rikers Island redevelopment as renewable energy facility

Can New York City Go Green Without Renewable Rikers?

New York City’s bold proposal to close the jail on Rikers Island and replace it with green infrastructure is in jeopardy. Will this compromise the city’s ambitious climate goals?

August 24, 2023 - Mark McNulty

A rendering of the Utah City master planned, mixed-use development.

700-Acre Master-Planned Community Planned in Utah

A massive development plan is taking shape for lakefront property in Vineyard, Utah—on the site of a former U.S. Steel Geneva Works facility.

August 31 - Daily Herald

A line of cars wait at the drive-thru window of a starbucks.

More Cities Ponder the End of Drive-Thrus

Drive-thru fast food restaurants might be a staple of American life, but several U.S. cities are actively considering prohibiting the development of new drive-thrus for the benefit of traffic safety, air quality, and congestion.

August 31 - The Denver Post

Air pollution is visible in the air around high-rise buildings in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Air Pollution World’s Worst Public Health Threat, Report Says

Air pollution is more likely to take years life off the lifespan of the average human than any other external factor, according to a recent report out of the University of Chicago.

August 31 - Phys.org