Public Lands in the United States, Part One: “Redeemed From Wilderness”

This is part one in a blog series examining the history of public lands in the United States and their shifting role in the American psyche.

6 minute read

May 31, 2023, 8:00 AM PDT

By Diana Ionescu @aworkoffiction


Looking up at giant sequoias in Mariposa Grove in Yosemite National Park at sunrise with sun's rays coming through trees

Mariposa Grove in Yosemite National Park, the earliest public land to be preserved for its natural beauty. | Stephen / Mariposa Grove in Yosemite National Park, California

For much of U.S. history, the concept of public lands and the extensive network of U.S. national parks have been praised as the nation’s ‘best idea.’ But how much land the federal government should own and what uses should be allowed on it are persistently up for debate. This series will outline the origin of publicly held land in the United States, the various ways it has been exploited and protected, and the movements that have shaped how we view land and natural resources today—with the acknowledgement that “public” is a fraught term that has not historically included everyone. As climate change exacerbates extreme weather events, resources like water become strained and extractive industries come into conflict with conservation goals, and population growth prompts more urban development, the problem of balancing land uses such as housing and conservation only becomes more urgent.

As the republic was forming on the heels of the Revolutionary War and conditions for statehood were being finalized, seven of the original 13 colonies held vague claims to lands west of the Appalachian divide, raising alarm about a power imbalance among the six colonies with fixed boundaries. In 1781, New York ceded its charter rights to land west of the Appalachian divide to the federal government, and the other six colonies followed suit by 1802. “E pluribus unum”—at least for those who got to benefit. This amounted to 236 million acres of new federal land, creating the first federally owned public lands in the United States and embedding federal lands into U.S. policy from the very beginning.

In the following decades, the United States purchased or acquired, under various agreements, close to 1.6 billion acres of land from France, Spain, Mexico, and Russia. As the United States continued its often violent westward expansion, claiming divine right over the continent and its native inhabitants, the young nation gained 1.8 billion acres of public lands by 1867. Throughout this time, government policies focused on expanding the reach of U.S. settlement, generating revenue, and promoting ranching, agriculture, mining, and other development on newly acquired lands. The General Land Office was created in 1812 “to oversee the survey and disposal of the public domain lands and to keep the federal land records.”

The federal government at first encouraged citizens to claim and exploit the land and its resources, calling on Americans to develop and ‘civilize’ the ‘virgin’ soil of the new United States through farming, ranching, mining, forestry, and other exploitative uses that would, as the thinking went at the time, put the land to better use than its prior residents. Land was distributed in the form of land grants to new states joining the Union, railroads and wagon roads, and individuals. More than 60 million acres were granted to Revolutionary War and War of 1812 veterans.

Starting in 1862, the Homestead Act and other laws were passed to encourage settlement and development by U.S. settlers in the western part of the country. The Homestead Act granted 160 acres to heads of families in exchange for a small fee and a pledge to continuously occupy the land for five years. The act applied to anyone “who had never borne arms against the U.S. government” and required recipients to farm on the land. Intended to create a class of largely independent yeoman farmers—an idealized lifestyle popularized by Thomas Jefferson as the pinnacle of American success and independence—the Homestead Act was vulnerable to corruption. According to the National Archives, most of the land distributed under the act in the 18th century went to speculators, miners, large ranchers, loggers, and railroad companies. (A later version of the Homestead Act, intended to promote part-time subsistence farming, was created as part of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal programs to pull the country out of the Great Depression. More on this in a future post.)

The Pacific Railroad Act of 1862 granted 174 million acres of public lands to railroad companies to coax private railroad builders to undertake the expensive and dangerous (for the workers) project of building a transcontinental railroad. The Southern Homestead Act of 1866 specifically included Black Americans, although systemic discrimination and other factors meant many Black households couldn’t take advantage of the act. The Mining Law of 1872 created the opportunity to claim mineral rights on public land and planted the seeds for many present-day western communities and ‘ghost towns’ that began as mining camps.

Other acts that distributed land for various purposes included the Timber Culture Act (1873), which operated on the mistaken belief that planting trees on the dry prairie landscape of the American west would increase rainfall. The Desert Land Act (1877) expanded the 160 acres in the original Homestead Act to 640 acres to encourage faster settlement and irrigation of arid desert lands, setting up future conflicts over unsustainable water demand and water rights. The Timber and Stone Act (1878), sold land deemed unfit for farming but appropriate for forestry and mining at low costs. Although the act technically limited purchases to 160 acres, large mining and timber companies managed to acquire and consolidate large tracts of land.

All of these acts incentivized—and, in many cases, required—specific types of settlement and exploitation or cultivation in exchange for access to affordable land. All in all, roughly 640 million acres were transferred to American individuals and corporations through acts like these.

By the mid-19th century, some Americans began viewing scenic wilderness spots as worthy of protection for their own sake and for the enjoyment of people as parks and places of leisure. On June 30, 1864, President Abraham Lincoln signed the Yosemite Valley Grant Act, introduced by California Senator John Conness, transferring ownership of the Yosemite Valley and Mariposa Grove from the federal government to the new state of California under the condition that it remain forever preserved for public use and recreation. This marked the first time U.S. land was reserved for public use and not just for a privileged class, planting the seed for the future National Park System and the ethos of conservation and that would guide future leaders in the environmental movement.

The conservation of Yosemite strictly for its natural beauty marked a significant departure from the government’s stance on open land at the time. Not long before, in describing land that acquired more than two people per square mile, the U.S. Census Bureau called it “redeemed from wilderness and brought into the service of man,” an attitude that continued, for some, well into the 20th century.

In the late 1800s, this shift in priorities, along with the decline in available ‘vacant’ and undeveloped land, led the federal government to establish agencies that would preserve and protect public lands for conservation and recreation purposes, leading to new conflicts with the ranchers, miners, and farmers who the same government earlier encouraged to exploit the land to its fullest.

In part two of this series, we’ll see the rise of the conservation movement and the formalization of agencies tasked with protecting public lands and natural resources such as the National Park Service, as well as the positive and negative impacts of the Great Depression and New Deal-era government programs on public lands.


Diana Ionescu

Diana is a writer and urbanist passionate about public space, historical memory, and transportation equity. Prior to joining Planetizen, she started and managed a farmers' market and worked as a transportation planner in the bike share industry. She is Planetizen's editor as of January 2022.

An aerial view of Milwaukee’s Third Ward.

Plan to Potentially Remove Downtown Milwaukee’s Interstate Faces Public Scrutiny

The public is weighing in on a suite of options for repairing, replacing, or removing Interstate 794 in downtown Milwaukee.

August 27, 2023 - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Portland Bus Lane

‘Forward Together’ Bus System Redesign Rolling Out in Portland

Portland is redesigning its bus system to respond to the changing patterns of the post-pandemic world—with twin goals of increasing ridership and improving equity.

August 30, 2023 - Mass Transit

Conceptual rendering of Rikers Island redevelopment as renewable energy facility

Can New York City Go Green Without Renewable Rikers?

New York City’s bold proposal to close the jail on Rikers Island and replace it with green infrastructure is in jeopardy. Will this compromise the city’s ambitious climate goals?

August 24, 2023 - Mark McNulty

A rendering of the Utah City master planned, mixed-use development.

700-Acre Master-Planned Community Planned in Utah

A massive development plan is taking shape for lakefront property in Vineyard, Utah—on the site of a former U.S. Steel Geneva Works facility.

August 31 - Daily Herald

A line of cars wait at the drive-thru window of a starbucks.

More Cities Ponder the End of Drive-Thrus

Drive-thru fast food restaurants might be a staple of American life, but several U.S. cities are actively considering prohibiting the development of new drive-thrus for the benefit of traffic safety, air quality, and congestion.

August 31 - The Denver Post

Air pollution is visible in the air around high-rise buildings in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Air Pollution World’s Worst Public Health Threat, Report Says

Air pollution is more likely to take years life off the lifespan of the average human than any other external factor, according to a recent report out of the University of Chicago.

August 31 - Phys.org