The technology to make traffic enforcement obsolete is becoming available. But in the U.S. willing to use it?
A new document from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration quietly asks the public its opinion on a radical change. In a new federal rule making on vehicle safety, it asks: should we explore requiring speed limiting technology in U.S. cars?
In the most tentative way, the agency is introducing a discussion about what will this year become law in the European Union: Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA). ISA—or speed governors—is technology that automatically limits drivers to, or around, the posted speed limit using GPS technology (except in rare circumstances when it needs to be overridden for safety reasons).
As fantastical as it seems, it’s relatively uncontroversial in a lot of our peer nations. And road ready as well. In July, it will become mandatory on all new vehicles in Europe.
In the United States, where traffic deaths rates are many times that of Europe, federal regulators are signaling that adoption is a vaguely distant future possibility. (It’s proposed for consideration over a ten-year timetable.)
“Should NHTSA take into consideration systems, such as intelligent speed assist systems, which determine current speed limits and warn the driver or adjust the maximum traveling speed accordingly?” the agency asks tentatively, inviting feedback from the public.
Part of the reason for the hesitancy is certainly cultural. Speeding is such a taken-for-granted part of American driving—almost an entitlement. We seem to have forgotten how dangerous it is. But that doesn’t mean the bodies have stopped piling up.
According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), in an average year in the United States about 10,000 people are killed in speeding related crashes. And during the pandemic, thanks to a surge of reckless driving, it’s gotten worse. With fatality numbers up 19 percent over just two years, on a miles-driven basis.
There may be another contributing factor to increasing road carnage that is more thorny: A decline in traffic enforcement following the Black Lives Matter protests of last summer. Cities have ample reason to rethink traffic stops, which are frequently biased and often escalate into tragic and costly shootings.
But not enforcing dangerous driving seems to have its downside as well. Part of the explanation for rising road fatalities might be a side effect.
Which is why it’s disappointing there isn’t more enthusiasm from federal regulators right now about a technology that could replace traffic enforcement while tamping down bad behavior on the roads and the attending carnage.
The availability of ISA comes at opportune time. It’s not just speeding that could be all but eliminated technologically. An obscure passage in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act will require, for the first time, automakers to install anti drunk driving technology standard in all new cars. These systems can detect when a driver is intoxicated and disable the vehicle. (Drunk driving causes about 10,000 deaths a year in the United States as well, the CDC estimates.)
Technology is also becoming available that uses the same sort of advanced technology to detect distraction and “nudge” drivers eyes back to the road and hands back to the steering wheel—similar to the “beep, beep, beep” system we’ve used to quietly self-enforce seat belt use.
It must be noted that none of this technology would solve the problem overnight. It takes about 11 years for the vehicle fleet in the United States to turn over—to replace all the old cars with new cars.
But if we had the will to install these life-saving technologies, we could start to see improvements immediately. And the 11-year replacement period would give us a chance to transition the million-some people whose job it is to enforce traffic rules into different roles.
In the past, the United States has been resistant—for political reasons—to using speed limiting technology, even in commercial trucks. But the time has come to rethink traffic enforcement and vehicle safety technology. The longer we wait, the farther we will fall behind and the more people will get killed.
Plan to Potentially Remove Downtown Milwaukee’s Interstate Faces Public Scrutiny
The public is weighing in on a suite of options for repairing, replacing, or removing Interstate 794 in downtown Milwaukee.
‘Forward Together’ Bus System Redesign Rolling Out in Portland
Portland is redesigning its bus system to respond to the changing patterns of the post-pandemic world—with twin goals of increasing ridership and improving equity.
Can New York City Go Green Without Renewable Rikers?
New York City’s bold proposal to close the jail on Rikers Island and replace it with green infrastructure is in jeopardy. Will this compromise the city’s ambitious climate goals?
700-Acre Master-Planned Community Planned in Utah
A massive development plan is taking shape for lakefront property in Vineyard, Utah—on the site of a former U.S. Steel Geneva Works facility.
More Cities Ponder the End of Drive-Thrus
Drive-thru fast food restaurants might be a staple of American life, but several U.S. cities are actively considering prohibiting the development of new drive-thrus for the benefit of traffic safety, air quality, and congestion.
Air Pollution World’s Worst Public Health Threat, Report Says
Air pollution is more likely to take years life off the lifespan of the average human than any other external factor, according to a recent report out of the University of Chicago.
Placer County
City of Morganton
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Dongguan Binhaiwan Bay Area Management Committee
City of Waukesha, WI
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Indiana Borough
Write for Planetizen
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.