Yes, Trump Can Recoup the $3.5 Billion Awarded to California High-Speed Rail

The beleaguered project is still very much alive, despite some media claims to the contrary. As for the Trump administration's claim to two grants awarded to the now-$77 billion project, the state has a deadline to meet if it wants to keep them.

3 minute read

March 4, 2019, 12:00 PM PST

By Irvin Dawid


California Governor

JD Lasica / Flickr

Did California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) "dramatically downsize the high-speed rail project," as Planetizen and other outlets inferred from his first state-of-the-state address to lawmakers on Feb. 12?

Ben Adler, capitol bureau chief for Sacramento's NPR-affiliate, Capital Public Radio, provides much-needed answers to the status of the nation's largest mega-project based on interviews with four top officials in the governor’s office and Newsom administration.

Readers may wish to listen to the 2-minute tape of his piece, originally published on Feb. 14, and most importantly, updated on Feb. 21 to comment on the Federal Railroad Administration's attempt to recoup $3.5 billion awarded to the $77 billion project.

First, the San Francisco-to-Los Angeles project, as most people know it, wasn't actually downsized. "Don’t even say 'paused' or 'scaled back,'” as Adler writes below. Ponder the two most overlooked words in the governor's speech: "as planned."

“Let’s be real,” the governor told a joint session of the California Legislature on Tuesday. “The current project, as planned, would cost too much and, respectfully, take too long.”

Newsom continued:

“We’ll finish phase one of the environmental work,” Newsom announced, referring to the environmental review of that full segment. (To clarify: Phase one is the 520 mile, SF-to-Anaheim segment. The Central Valley stretch is a subsection of that larger segment.)

Click on this interactive map by the California High-Speed Rail Authority to understand project phases and project sections.

In other words, forget “canceled” or “abandoned.” Don’t even say “paused” or “scaled back.”

The most you can really say about the Bay Area-to-Anaheim stretch known as “Phase 1” is that it’s merely on the back burner for the time being.

Adler's updated article adds clarity to the Federal Railroad Administration's attempt to "cancel the $929 million in Federal grant funds yet to be paid for the California High-Speed Rail project (and) seek the return from California of $2.5 billion in Federal funds FRA previously granted..." [Also, see prior post.]

The money came with three strings attached:

  • Spend the $2.55 billion in stimulus funds by September 2017. This requirement has been met [pdf].
  • Complete environmental reviews on the full 520 mile San Francisco-to-Anaheim segment known as “Phase 1” by December 31, 2022. The High-Speed Rail Authority says it has “environmentally cleared” the 171-mile stretch from Merced to downtown Bakersfield called for by Newsom and is “progressing on the remaining project sections.”
  • Complete construction on the 119-mile stretch from Madera to the outskirts of Bakersfield by December 31, 2022. That work is underway.

Bottom line: "The state has less than three years to finish all its environmental reviews and complete the 119 miles of track from Madera to northern Bakersfield," notes Adler. But the bottom line only holds for the Trump administration. The outlook could dramatically change depending on what happens on Nov. 3, 2020, as he notes below.

If Democrats win the White House and control of Congress in next year’s elections, high-speed rail funding could be right back on the table — at which point California will be ready to ask for new federal funding to keep building.

Related in Planetizen:

Thursday, February 21, 2019 in Capital Public Radio

Portland Bus Lane

‘Forward Together’ Bus System Redesign Rolling Out in Portland

Portland is redesigning its bus system to respond to the changing patterns of the post-pandemic world—with twin goals of increasing ridership and improving equity.

August 30, 2023 - Mass Transit

An aerial view of Milwaukee’s Third Ward.

Plan to Potentially Remove Downtown Milwaukee’s Interstate Faces Public Scrutiny

The public is weighing in on a suite of options for repairing, replacing, or removing Interstate 794 in downtown Milwaukee.

August 27, 2023 - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Conceptual rendering of Rikers Island redevelopment as renewable energy facility

Can New York City Go Green Without Renewable Rikers?

New York City’s bold proposal to close the jail on Rikers Island and replace it with green infrastructure is in jeopardy. Will this compromise the city’s ambitious climate goals?

August 24, 2023 - Mark McNulty

A rendering of the Utah City master planned, mixed-use development.

700-Acre Master-Planned Community Planned in Utah

A massive development plan is taking shape for lakefront property in Vineyard, Utah—on the site of a former U.S. Steel Geneva Works facility.

August 31 - Daily Herald

A line of cars wait at the drive-thru window of a starbucks.

More Cities Ponder the End of Drive-Thrus

Drive-thru fast food restaurants might be a staple of American life, but several U.S. cities are actively considering prohibiting the development of new drive-thrus for the benefit of traffic safety, air quality, and congestion.

August 31 - The Denver Post

Air pollution is visible in the air around high-rise buildings in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Air Pollution World’s Worst Public Health Threat, Report Says

Air pollution is more likely to take years life off the lifespan of the average human than any other external factor, according to a recent report out of the University of Chicago.

August 31 - Phys.org